Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NCBVX
JVMCX vs NCBVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NCBVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
Price$21.86
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.99M
JVMCX vs NCBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NCBVX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NCBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. NCBVX (167M). NCBVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NCBVX (0.95) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NCBVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NCBVX (27 years). NCBVX (2.81) is less costly to investors than JVMCX (1.86). NCBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX (1000) and NCBVX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NCBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. JVMCX (-1.78). NCBVX return over 5 years is better than : 94.90 vs. JVMCX (49.84).
| JVMCX | NCBVX | JVMCX / NCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.95 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 2.81 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.265 | 9.050 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 167M | 14,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | 8.34 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.84 | 36.59 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.84 | 94.90 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.13 | 37.25 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement