Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NMAVX
JVMCX vs NMAVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NMAVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$11.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets408.83M
JVMCX vs NMAVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NMAVX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and NMAVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. NMAVX (409M). NMAVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NMAVX (2.34) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NMAVX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NMAVX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NMAVX (1.26). NMAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAVX: JVMCX (1000) vs NMAVX (2500). NMAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.76 vs. JVMCX (-7.96). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.91 vs. NMAVX (-5.80).
| JVMCX | NMAVX | JVMCX / NMAVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.21 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.26 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.877 | -0.796 | -864% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 409M | 5,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.96 | -6.76 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.36 | -3.33 | -281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.91 | -5.80 | -464% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.70 | 25.53 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement