Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs NMVLX
JVMCX vs NMVLX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs NMVLX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.38
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.3B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Institutional
Price$11.47
Change-$0.05 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.39M
JVMCX vs NMVLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. NMVLX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and NMVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. NMVLX (530M). NMVLX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: NMVLX (3.80) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than NMVLX: JVMCX (14 years) vs NMVLX (11 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than NMVLX (0.99). NMVLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMVLX: JVMCX (1000) vs NMVLX (10000). NMVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.94 vs. JVMCX (-7.40). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. NMVLX (5.92).
| JVMCX | NMVLX | JVMCX / NMVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.94 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.99 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.870 | -4.317 | -20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 10000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3B | 530M | 4,019% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.40 | -5.94 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | -7.76 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | 5.92 | 869% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.42 | 23.21 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers