Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PQNCX
JVMCX vs PQNCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PQNCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.69
Change+$0.33 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.66B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
Price$18.00
Change+$0.24 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets550.38M
JVMCX vs PQNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PQNCX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Hold and PQNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. PQNCX (550M). PQNCX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PQNCX (1.91) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PQNCX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PQNCX (38 years). JVMCX (1.86) and PQNCX (1.84) have similar cost to investors . PQNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQNCX: JVMCX (1000) vs PQNCX (2500). PQNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.55 vs. JVMCX (-6.62). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.83 vs. PQNCX (-18.40).
| JVMCX | PQNCX | JVMCX / PQNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.75 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.84 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.142 | 1.312 | 621% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 550M | 4,309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.62 | -3.55 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.29 | -9.35 | -270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.83 | -18.40 | -216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.44 | -9.79 | -382% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers