Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZIMX
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZIMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.67
Change-$0.35 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.22B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$11.97
Change-$0.15 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.87M
JVMCX vs PZIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZIMX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and PZIMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. PZIMX (98.9M). PZIMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZIMX (1.43) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZIMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZIMX (12 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZIMX (0.97). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZIMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZIMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZIMX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.91 vs. PZIMX (-16.69). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.76 vs. PZIMX (18.88).
| JVMCX | PZIMX | JVMCX / PZIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.90 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.97 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.751 | 1.169 | 920% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 98.9M | 24,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.91 | -16.69 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.04 | -6.13 | -441% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.76 | 18.88 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.97 | 31.35 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement