Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMCX vs PZVMX
JVMCX vs PZVMX Comparison
Open Charts JVMCX vs PZVMX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.13
Change+$0.41 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.3B
Pzena Mid Cap Value Investor
Price$12.77
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.32M
JVMCX vs PZVMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMCX vs. PZVMX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMCX is a Buy and PZVMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. PZVMX (103M). PZVMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: PZVMX (1.01) vs JVMCX (0.00). JVMCX was incepted earlier than PZVMX: JVMCX (14 years) vs PZVMX (11 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than PZVMX (1.32). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PZVMX (35.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVMX: JVMCX (1000) vs PZVMX (5000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.15 vs. PZVMX (-14.25). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.92 vs. PZVMX (25.99).
| JVMCX | PZVMX | JVMCX / PZVMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.25 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.32 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.186 | 4.586 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 103M | 23,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.15 | -14.25 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.16 | -7.83 | -270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.92 | 25.99 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.95 | 37.25 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers