Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCCX
JVMRX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.07B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$29.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
JVMRX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCCX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. LMCCX (1.1B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: JVMRX (0.86) vs LMCCX (0.00). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCCX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.52 vs. LMCCX (-5.32). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 54.12 vs. LMCCX (28.53).
| JVMRX | LMCCX | JVMRX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.78 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.78 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.241 | -4.076 | -202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 1.1B | 2,098% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | -5.32 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.88 | 6.83 | 247% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.12 | 28.53 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.37 | 19.09 | 248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement