Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs LMCCX
JVMRX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$24.66
Change-$0.28 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.66B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$27.05
Change-$0.29 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
JVMRX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCCX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a StrongBuy and LMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. LMCCX (1.02B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: JVMRX (0.94) vs LMCCX (0.00). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. LMCCX (41.00). LMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCCX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX (-10.38) and LMCCX (-10.74) have marching annual gain over last year. JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 50.77 vs. LMCCX (35.95).
| JVMRX | LMCCX | JVMRX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.78 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.78 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.424 | -10.125 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 1.02B | 1,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.38 | -10.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.40 | -9.10 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.77 | 35.95 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.22 | 10.46 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers