Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCCX
JVMRX vs LMCCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.35B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock C
Price$30.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMRX vs LMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LMCCX (1.13B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCCX: JVMRX (0.84) vs LMCCX (0.00). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCCX (28 years). LMCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCCX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.73 vs. LMCCX (-9.15). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.71 vs. LMCCX (34.86).
| JVMRX | LMCCX | JVMRX / LMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.78 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.78 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.990 | -0.723 | -1,658% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 1.13B | 2,150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.73 | -9.15 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 13.93 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.71 | 34.86 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.74 | 31.30 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement