Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCFX
JVMRX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.18
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.64B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$33.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMRX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCFX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. LMCFX (1.11B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: JVMRX (0.88) vs LMCFX (0.75). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCFX (18 years). LMCFX (0.88) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCFX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.16 vs. LMCFX (-4.11). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 57.88 vs. LMCFX (41.92).
| JVMRX | LMCFX | JVMRX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.88 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.88 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.315 | 0.419 | 1,982% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 1.11B | 2,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.75 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.16 | -4.11 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | 18.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.88 | 41.92 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.04 | 35.24 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement