Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCFX
JVMRX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCFX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.07
Change-$0.19 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.88B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
Price$32.52
Change-$0.28 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMRX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. LMCFX (1.09B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: JVMRX (0.91) vs LMCFX (0.77). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCFX (18 years). LMCFX (0.88) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCFX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.20 vs. LMCFX (-2.83). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 63.42 vs. LMCFX (48.53).
| JVMRX | LMCFX | JVMRX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.88 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.88 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.900 | -1.738 | -282% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9B | 1.09B | 2,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.77 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.20 | -2.83 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.54 | 17.01 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.42 | 48.53 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.60 | 30.65 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers