Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCPX
JVMRX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.07
Change-$0.19 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.88B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$31.42
Change-$0.28 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMRX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCPX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. LMCPX (1.09B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: JVMRX (0.91) vs LMCPX (0.39). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). LMCPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCPX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.20 vs. LMCPX (-3.38). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 63.42 vs. LMCPX (45.43).
| JVMRX | LMCPX | JVMRX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.23 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.23 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.900 | -1.858 | -264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9B | 1.09B | 2,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.39 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.20 | -3.38 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.54 | 15.23 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.42 | 45.43 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.60 | 26.20 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement