Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCPX
JVMRX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.27
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.36B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$32.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
JVMRX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCPX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and LMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. LMCPX (1.14B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: JVMRX (0.84) vs LMCPX (0.36). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCPX (28 years). LMCPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCPX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.14 vs. LMCPX (-7.22). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 57.63 vs. LMCPX (42.21).
| JVMRX | LMCPX | JVMRX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.23 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.23 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.361 | 1.486 | 832% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.4B | 1.14B | 2,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.36 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | -7.22 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.08 | 20.66 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.63 | 42.21 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.97 | 40.90 | 147% |