Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs LMCPX
JVMRX vs LMCPX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCPX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$25.55
Change-$0.10 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.07B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
Price$29.64
Change-$0.26 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
JVMRX vs LMCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCPX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 20.1B vs. LMCPX (1.04B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCPX: JVMRX (0.94) vs LMCPX (0.39). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCPX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCPX (27 years). LMCPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. LMCPX (41.00). LMCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCPX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). LMCPX (-8.94) and JVMRX (-9.39) have marching annual gain over last year. JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.57 vs. LMCPX (45.80).
| JVMRX | LMCPX | JVMRX / LMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.23 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.23 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.160 | -8.235 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1B | 1.04B | 1,936% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.39 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.39 | -8.94 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.71 | -0.26 | 276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.57 | 45.80 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.02 | 17.68 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers