Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCQX
JVMRX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.07
Change-$0.19 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.88B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$32.12
Change-$0.29 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMRX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCQX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. LMCQX (1.09B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCQX: JVMRX (0.91) vs LMCQX (0.25). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCQX (17 years). LMCQX (1.38) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.20 vs. LMCQX (-3.34). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 63.42 vs. LMCQX (45.35).
| JVMRX | LMCQX | JVMRX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.38 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.900 | -1.936 | -253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9B | 1.09B | 2,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.25 | 362% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.20 | -3.34 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.54 | 15.13 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.42 | 45.35 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.60 | 25.65 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement