Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCQX
JVMRX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCQX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.71
Change-$0.37 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.22B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.27
Change-$0.28 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMRX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCQX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. LMCQX (1.14B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCQX: JVMRX (0.84) vs LMCQX (0.23). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCQX (18 years). LMCQX (1.38) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCQX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.20 vs. LMCQX (-7.92). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 49.87 vs. LMCQX (36.21).
| JVMRX | LMCQX | JVMRX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.38 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.656 | 1.513 | 770% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 1.14B | 2,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.23 | 359% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.20 | -7.92 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 24.97 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.87 | 36.21 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.07 | 37.32 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement