Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCRX
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$27.62
Change-$0.33 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.73B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$31.94
Change-$0.37 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCRX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. LMCRX (1.08B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: JVMRX (0.91) vs LMCRX (0.32). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCRX (17 years). LMCRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (47.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.60 vs. LMCRX (-4.85). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 54.49 vs. LMCRX (39.31).
| JVMRX | LMCRX | JVMRX / LMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.749 | -3.031 | -124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 1.08B | 2,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.32 | 280% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | -4.85 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.46 | 15.73 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.49 | 39.31 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.38 | 25.47 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers