Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCRX
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$27.14
Change-$0.12 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.28B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$31.75
Change-$0.16 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCRX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. LMCRX (1.07B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: JVMRX (0.96) vs LMCRX (0.33). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCRX (17 years). LMCRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (47.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.73 vs. LMCRX (-6.11). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 58.98 vs. LMCRX (45.27).
| JVMRX | LMCRX | JVMRX / LMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.188 | -4.232 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3B | 1.07B | 1,985% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.33 | 288% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.73 | -6.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.70 | 7.75 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.98 | 45.27 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.94 | 24.24 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers