Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCRX
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.38
Change-$0.22 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.76B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R3
Price$32.44
Change-$0.23 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMRX vs LMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCRX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. LMCRX (1.11B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCRX: JVMRX (0.86) vs LMCRX (0.31). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCRX (17 years). LMCRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.62 vs. LMCRX (-6.83). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 51.75 vs. LMCRX (33.57).
| JVMRX | LMCRX | JVMRX / LMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.28 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.874 | -1.951 | -506% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 1.11B | 2,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.31 | 278% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.62 | -6.83 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.01 | 6.45 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.75 | 33.57 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.26 | 26.96 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement