Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCSX
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.89
Change+$0.35 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.34B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$33.57
Change+$0.21 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCSX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.3B vs. LMCSX (1.11B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: JVMRX (0.88) vs LMCSX (0.56). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). LMCSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. LMCSX (-1.00). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 59.47 vs. LMCSX (43.48).
| JVMRX | LMCSX | JVMRX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.03 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.939 | -0.832 | -714% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3B | 1.11B | 2,016% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.56 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -1.00 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.21 | 18.99 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.47 | 43.48 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.14 | 32.12 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement