Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCSX
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.08
Change+$0.14 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.11B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$34.27
Change+$0.15 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. LMCSX (1.13B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: JVMRX (0.84) vs LMCSX (0.53). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). LMCSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.95 vs. LMCSX (-6.91). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 49.17 vs. LMCSX (38.14).
| JVMRX | LMCSX | JVMRX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.03 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.03 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.136 | 1.427 | 780% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 1.13B | 2,133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.53 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.95 | -6.91 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.92 | 25.79 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.17 | 38.14 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.96 | 41.00 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement