Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCSX
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.48B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$33.38
Change-$0.14 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and LMCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. LMCSX (1.09B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: JVMRX (0.85) vs LMCSX (0.54). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). LMCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.35 vs. LMCSX (-11.43). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.25 vs. LMCSX (24.98).
| JVMRX | LMCSX | JVMRX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.02 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.02 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.906 | -0.357 | -2,216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 1.09B | 2,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.54 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.35 | -11.43 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.97 | 12.46 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.25 | 24.98 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.00 | 38.58 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement