Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs LMCSX
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs LMCSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.50
Change+$0.21 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.92B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4
Price$34.10
Change+$0.18 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
JVMRX vs LMCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. LMCSX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and LMCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. LMCSX (1.11B). JVMRX pays higher dividends than LMCSX: JVMRX (0.88) vs LMCSX (0.56). JVMRX was incepted earlier than LMCSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs LMCSX (10 years). LMCSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). LMCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). LMCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: LMCSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. LMCSX (-3.80). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 58.78 vs. LMCSX (41.85).
| JVMRX | LMCSX | JVMRX / LMCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.03 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.03 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.503 | 0.832 | 1,142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 1.11B | 2,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.56 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | -3.80 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.50 | 18.39 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.78 | 41.85 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.49 | 36.23 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers