Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs NBMRX
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$25.43
Change-$1.50 (-5.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.35B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$23.05
Change-$1.77 (-7.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.03M
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBMRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. NBMRX (51M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: JVMRX (0.94) vs NBMRX (0.87). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.84 vs. JVMRX (-7.83). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 123.97 vs. JVMRX (90.92).
| JVMRX | NBMRX | JVMRX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.72 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.037 | -5.412 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.4B | 51M | 41,961% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.87 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.83 | -6.84 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.32 | -2.94 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.92 | 123.97 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers