Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBMRX
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.98
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$27.63
Change+$0.26 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.74M
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBMRX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. NBMRX (51.7M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: JVMRX (0.86) vs NBMRX (0.80). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). NBMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.56 vs. JVMRX (0.90). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 75.37 vs. JVMRX (53.09).
| JVMRX | NBMRX | JVMRX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.75 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.72 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.507 | 4.306 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 51.7M | 46,422% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.80 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | 1.56 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.98 | 16.00 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.09 | 75.37 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement