Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBMRX
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBMRX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.90
Change-$0.17 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.32B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val R6
Price$26.00
Change-$0.12 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.38M
JVMRX vs NBMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBMRX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NBMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.3B vs. NBMRX (50.4M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBMRX: JVMRX (0.86) vs NBMRX (0.80). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBMRX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBMRX (6 years). NBMRX (1.72) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBMRX (29.00). NBMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBMRX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.38 vs. NBMRX (3.80). NBMRX return over 5 years is better than : 69.67 vs. JVMRX (51.76).
| JVMRX | NBMRX | JVMRX / NBMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.75 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.72 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.906 | -0.457 | -1,729% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.3B | 50.4M | 46,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.80 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 3.80 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.07 | 9.66 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.76 | 69.67 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement