Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NBRAX
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NBRAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.81
Change-$0.25 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.2B
Neuberger Berman M/C Intrinsic Val A
Price$28.01
Change-$0.17 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.39M
JVMRX vs NBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NBRAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. NBRAX (52.4M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than NBRAX: JVMRX (0.84) vs NBRAX (0.36). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NBRAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NBRAX (15 years). NBRAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. NBRAX (29.00). NBRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NBRAX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NBRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. JVMRX (-0.10). NBRAX return over 5 years is better than : 87.78 vs. JVMRX (62.22).
| JVMRX | NBRAX | JVMRX / NBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.21 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.78 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.581 | 7.189 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 52.4M | 46,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.36 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | 4.21 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.68 | 33.29 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.22 | 87.78 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.13 | 40.89 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement