Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NCBVX
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NCBVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.44B
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
Price$21.44
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.88M
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NCBVX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NCBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. NCBVX (161M). NCBVX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NCBVX (0.96) vs JVMRX (0.85). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NCBVX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NCBVX (27 years). NCBVX (2.81) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). NCBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). NCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NCBVX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NCBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.36 vs. JVMRX (-6.89). NCBVX return over 5 years is better than : 63.17 vs. JVMRX (32.02).
| JVMRX | NCBVX | JVMRX / NCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 2.81 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.721 | 6.900 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.4B | 161M | 14,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.96 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.89 | 3.36 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.78 | 26.12 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.02 | 63.17 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.75 | 33.03 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers