Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NCBVX
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NCBVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.35B
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
Price$21.86
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.03M
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NCBVX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NCBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. NCBVX (165M). NCBVX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NCBVX (0.95) vs JVMRX (0.84). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NCBVX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NCBVX (27 years). NCBVX (2.81) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). NCBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). NCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NCBVX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NCBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. JVMRX (-0.68). NCBVX return over 5 years is better than : 84.80 vs. JVMRX (48.87).
| JVMRX | NCBVX | JVMRX / NCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 2.81 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.990 | 8.850 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 165M | 14,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.68 | 7.04 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.41 | 34.45 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.87 | 84.80 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.31 | 36.69 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers