Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NCBVX
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NCBVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.79
Change-$0.30 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.77B
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
Price$20.31
Change-$0.24 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.97M
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NCBVX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and NCBVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.8B vs. NCBVX (159M). NCBVX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NCBVX (1.00) vs JVMRX (0.86). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NCBVX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NCBVX (27 years). NCBVX (2.81) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). NCBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). NCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NCBVX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NCBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.60 vs. JVMRX (-0.77). NCBVX return over 5 years is better than : 92.65 vs. JVMRX (56.16).
| JVMRX | NCBVX | JVMRX / NCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 2.81 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.981 | 2.750 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8B | 159M | 14,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.00 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | 4.60 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.02 | 20.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.16 | 92.65 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.44 | 24.22 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers