Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NCBVX
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NCBVX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.05
Change+$0.68 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.6B
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
Price$21.47
Change+$0.49 (+2.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.02M
JVMRX vs NCBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NCBVX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and NCBVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. NCBVX (163M). NCBVX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NCBVX (1.00) vs JVMRX (0.86). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NCBVX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NCBVX (27 years). NCBVX (2.81) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). NCBVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). NCBVX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NCBVX (1000) vs JVMRX (1000000). NCBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.68 vs. JVMRX (-0.32). NCBVX return over 5 years is better than : 90.07 vs. JVMRX (54.19).
| JVMRX | NCBVX | JVMRX / NCBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 2.81 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.020 | 4.900 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.6B | 163M | 14,479% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.00 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.32 | 6.68 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | 21.12 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.19 | 90.07 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.52 | 39.67 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers