Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs NMVLX
JVMRX vs NMVLX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs NMVLX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$30.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.35B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Institutional
Price$12.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets445.1M
JVMRX vs NMVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. NMVLX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and NMVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. NMVLX (445M). NMVLX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: NMVLX (2.64) vs JVMRX (0.84). JVMRX was incepted earlier than NMVLX: JVMRX (14 years) vs NMVLX (12 years). NMVLX (0.99) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). NMVLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). NMVLX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: NMVLX (10000) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.73 vs. NMVLX (-7.09). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.71 vs. NMVLX (7.46).
| JVMRX | NMVLX | JVMRX / NMVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.99 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.990 | 2.156 | 556% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 445M | 5,461% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 2.64 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.73 | -7.09 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.62 | 5.28 | 486% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.71 | 7.46 | 761% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.74 | 39.46 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement