Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs PCMSX
JVMRX vs PCMSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PCMSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.52
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.55B
Principal MidCap Value I R6
Price$16.20
Change+$0.09 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
JVMRX vs PCMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PCMSX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and PCMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. PCMSX (2.31B). PCMSX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PCMSX (1.37) vs JVMRX (0.86). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PCMSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PCMSX (6 years). JVMRX (0.75) is less costly to investors than PCMSX (0.65). PCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.30 vs. JVMRX (49.00). PCMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PCMSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.29 vs. PCMSX (-10.13). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 53.64 vs. PCMSX (32.75).
| JVMRX | PCMSX | JVMRX / PCMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.63 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.65 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.909 | 3.402 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 2.31B | 1,017% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.37 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | -10.13 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.76 | -2.37 | -582% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.64 | 32.75 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers