Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs PCMSX
JVMRX vs PCMSX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PCMSX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.23
Change+$0.19 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
Principal MidCap Value I R6
Price$16.18
Change+$0.09 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
JVMRX vs PCMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PCMSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and PCMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. PCMSX (2.5B). PCMSX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PCMSX (1.38) vs JVMRX (0.88). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PCMSX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PCMSX (6 years). JVMRX (0.76) is less costly to investors than PCMSX (0.65). PCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.30 vs. JVMRX (49.00). PCMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PCMSX (0) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.59 vs. PCMSX (-4.44). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 63.32 vs. PCMSX (42.05).
| JVMRX | PCMSX | JVMRX / PCMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.63 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.65 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.500 | 3.851 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 2.5B | 903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.38 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.59 | -4.44 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.14 | 6.92 | 349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.32 | 42.05 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement