Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs PQNAX
JVMRX vs PQNAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PQNAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$25.21
Change+$0.22 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.68B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A
Price$23.63
Change+$0.18 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.57M
JVMRX vs PQNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PQNAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and PQNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 19.7B vs. PQNAX (562M). PQNAX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PQNAX (1.82) vs JVMRX (0.94). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PQNAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PQNAX (34 years). PQNAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). PQNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. JVMRX (47.00). PQNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PQNAX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). PQNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.67 vs. JVMRX (-11.53). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 53.14 vs. PQNAX (4.82).
| JVMRX | PQNAX | JVMRX / PQNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.00 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.12 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.238 | -7.713 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7B | 562M | 3,505% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.82 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.53 | -2.67 | 431% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.95 | -22.57 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.14 | 4.82 | 1,103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.91 | -2.36 | -1,057% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...