Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs PQNCX
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PQNCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.18
Change+$0.09 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.64B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
Price$18.03
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets598.06M
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PQNCX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and PQNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. PQNCX (598M). PQNCX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PQNCX (1.99) vs JVMRX (0.88). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PQNCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PQNCX (37 years). PQNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). PQNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). PQNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PQNCX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). PQNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.08 vs. JVMRX (-0.16). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 57.88 vs. PQNCX (-11.35).
| JVMRX | PQNCX | JVMRX / PQNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.75 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.84 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.315 | 2.852 | 292% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 598M | 3,779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.99 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.16 | 3.08 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.06 | -21.48 | -98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.88 | -11.35 | -510% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.04 | -11.90 | -404% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers