Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs PQNCX
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PQNCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$25.02
Change+$0.30 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.53B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
Price$16.14
Change+$0.25 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.55M
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PQNCX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a StrongBuy and PQNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. PQNCX (555M). PQNCX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PQNCX (1.99) vs JVMRX (0.94). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PQNCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PQNCX (37 years). PQNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). PQNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. JVMRX (47.00). PQNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PQNCX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). PQNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.33 vs. JVMRX (-12.42). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 55.10 vs. PQNCX (-11.64).
| JVMRX | PQNCX | JVMRX / PQNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.75 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.84 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.241 | -9.355 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.5B | 555M | 3,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.99 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.42 | -4.33 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.22 | -34.12 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.10 | -11.64 | -474% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.11 | -22.67 | -111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers