Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs PQNCX
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PQNCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.72B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
Price$17.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.74M
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PQNCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and PQNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. PQNCX (580M). PQNCX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PQNCX (2.04) vs JVMRX (0.91). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PQNCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PQNCX (37 years). PQNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). PQNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). PQNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PQNCX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). PQNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.40 vs. JVMRX (-0.45). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. PQNCX (-9.47).
| JVMRX | PQNCX | JVMRX / PQNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.75 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.84 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.195 | -1.198 | -350% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 580M | 3,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 2.04 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | 4.40 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.41 | -23.17 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.32 | -9.47 | -658% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.93 | -14.98 | -293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers