Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs PQNCX
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs PQNCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.74
Change+$0.35 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.66B
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
Price$18.00
Change+$0.24 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets550.38M
JVMRX vs PQNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. PQNCX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and PQNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. PQNCX (550M). PQNCX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: PQNCX (1.91) vs JVMRX (0.84). JVMRX was incepted earlier than PQNCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs PQNCX (38 years). PQNCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). PQNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). PQNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: PQNCX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). PQNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.55 vs. JVMRX (-4.95). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.93 vs. PQNCX (-18.40).
| JVMRX | PQNCX | JVMRX / PQNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.75 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.84 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.094 | 1.312 | 693% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 550M | 4,309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.91 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.95 | -3.55 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.52 | -9.35 | -316% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.93 | -18.40 | -255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.22 | -9.79 | -523% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers