Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs QNTAX
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs QNTAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$29.94
Change-$0.20 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.26B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$40.42
Change-$0.22 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.31M
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. QNTAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Hold and QNTAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. QNTAX (41.3M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than QNTAX: JVMRX (0.84) vs QNTAX (0.75). JVMRX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs QNTAX (9 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.75). QNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 283.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). QNTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: QNTAX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). QNTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. JVMRX (-0.35). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 50.09 vs. QNTAX (37.74).
| JVMRX | QNTAX | JVMRX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.55 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.55 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.878 | 17.575 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 41.3M | 58,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.75 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.35 | 0.18 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.79 | 36.59 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.09 | 37.74 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement