Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs QNTAX
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs QNTAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$24.89
Change+$0.23 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.44B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$32.18
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.28M
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. QNTAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a StrongBuy and QNTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 19.4B vs. QNTAX (33.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: QNTAX (1.20) vs JVMRX (0.94). JVMRX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs QNTAX (8 years). QNTAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. QNTAX (38.00). QNTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: QNTAX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.95 vs. QNTAX (-12.83). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 49.07 vs. QNTAX (38.17).
| JVMRX | QNTAX | JVMRX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.53 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.53 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.463 | -7.604 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4B | 33.3M | 58,258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.95 | -12.83 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.58 | -11.16 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.07 | 38.17 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers