Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs QNTAX
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs QNTAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$28.78
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.24B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$37.57
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.26M
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. QNTAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and QNTAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 22.2B vs. QNTAX (38.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: QNTAX (0.94) vs JVMRX (0.88). JVMRX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs QNTAX (9 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). QNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 283.00 vs. JVMRX (49.00). QNTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: QNTAX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.47 vs. QNTAX (-7.71). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. QNTAX (36.90).
| JVMRX | QNTAX | JVMRX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.55 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.55 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.533 | 8.130 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.2B | 38.3M | 57,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.47 | -7.71 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.50 | 20.71 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.29 | 36.90 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement