Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs QNTAX
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs QNTAX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$26.22
Change-$0.49 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.34B
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$33.87
Change-$0.94 (-2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.92M
JVMRX vs QNTAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. QNTAX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and QNTAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. QNTAX (35.9M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than JVMRX: QNTAX (1.24) vs JVMRX (0.91). JVMRX was incepted earlier than QNTAX: JVMRX (14 years) vs QNTAX (8 years). QNTAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. QNTAX (38.00). QNTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: QNTAX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). JVMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.35 vs. QNTAX (-8.17). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 41.97 vs. QNTAX (21.05).
| JVMRX | QNTAX | JVMRX / QNTAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.53 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.53 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.854 | 0.057 | -1,485% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3B | 35.9M | 59,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.35 | -8.17 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.80 | 1.99 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.97 | 21.05 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers