Ad is loading...
JVMRX vs TMFCX
JVMRX vs TMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs TMFCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$26.59
Change+$0.25 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.63B
Touchstone Mid Cap Value C
Price$20.68
Change+$0.14 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets543.05M
JVMRX vs TMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. TMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and TMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 20.6B vs. TMFCX (543M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than TMFCX: JVMRX (0.96) vs TMFCX (0.12). JVMRX was incepted earlier than TMFCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs TMFCX (16 years). TMFCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. TMFCX (37.00). TMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: TMFCX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). TMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.66 vs. JVMRX (-7.91). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 53.53 vs. TMFCX (37.04).
| JVMRX | TMFCX | JVMRX / TMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.93 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 2.80 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.227 | -3.067 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 543M | 3,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.12 | 777% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.91 | -5.66 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.83 | -1.98 | -294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.53 | 37.04 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.98 | 21.60 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...