Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMRX vs TMFCX
JVMRX vs TMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JVMRX vs TMFCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
Price$27.85
Change+$0.27 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.45B
Touchstone Mid Cap Value C
Price$21.18
Change+$0.22 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets548.73M
JVMRX vs TMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMRX vs. TMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMRX is a Buy and TMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMRX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. TMFCX (549M). JVMRX pays higher dividends than TMFCX: JVMRX (0.91) vs TMFCX (0.12). JVMRX was incepted earlier than TMFCX: JVMRX (14 years) vs TMFCX (16 years). TMFCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than JVMRX (0.76). JVMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. TMFCX (37.00). TMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMRX: TMFCX (2500) vs JVMRX (1000000). TMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.24 vs. JVMRX (-2.97). JVMRX return over 5 years is better than : 40.13 vs. TMFCX (24.60).
| JVMRX | TMFCX | JVMRX / TMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.93 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 2.80 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.376 | -1.085 | -219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 549M | 3,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.12 | 759% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.97 | -1.24 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.82 | -6.56 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.13 | 24.60 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.58 | 25.04 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers