Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JVMTX vs SMVZX
JVMTX vs SMVZX Comparison
Open Charts JVMTX vs SMVZX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R4
Price$28.94
Change-$0.69 (-2.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.36B
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$12.80
Change-$0.37 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
JVMTX vs SMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JVMTX vs. SMVZX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JVMTX is a StrongBuy and SMVZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMTX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. SMVZX (1.06B). SMVZX pays higher dividends than JVMTX: SMVZX (1.08) vs JVMTX (0.62). JVMTX was incepted earlier than SMVZX: JVMTX (12 years) vs SMVZX (11 years). JVMTX (1.10) is less costly to investors than SMVZX (0.88). SMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. JVMTX (49.00). JVMTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMVZX: JVMTX (0) vs SMVZX (2500000). SMVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.50 vs. JVMTX (-2.38). JVMTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. SMVZX (22.34).
| JVMTX | SMVZX | JVMTX / SMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.88 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.108 | 9.114 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.4B | 1.06B | 2,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.08 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 2.50 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.46 | 40.41 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.87 | 22.34 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.07 | 15.23 | 342% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement