Advertisement
JXHGF vs JXHLY
To understand the difference between ENEOS Holdings Inc. (JXHGF) vs. ENEOS Holdings Inc. - ADR (JXHLY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JXHGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJXHLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- JXHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JXHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JXHGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JXHLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- JXHGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- JXHLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
JXHGF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JXHLY (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -8.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.69%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil Refining/Marketing (-1.04% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| JXHGF | JXHLY | JXHGF / JXHLY | |
| Capitalization | 11B | 11B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 872B | 872B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 5.436 | 3.141 | 173% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.57 | 11.27 | 94% |
| Revenue | 14.63T | 14.63T | 100% |
| Total Cash | 614B | 614B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 4.11T | 4.11T | 100% |
JXHGF | JXHLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 24 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JXHLY's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as JXHGF (85). This means that JXHLY’s stock grew similarly to JXHGF’s over the last 12 months.
JXHGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as JXHLY (42). This means that JXHGF’s stock grew similarly to JXHLY’s over the last 12 months.
JXHGF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JXHLY (100). This means that JXHGF’s stock grew similarly to JXHLY’s over the last 12 months.
JXHGF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as JXHLY (60). This means that JXHGF’s stock grew similarly to JXHLY’s over the last 12 months.
JXHGF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as JXHLY (1). This means that JXHGF’s stock grew similarly to JXHLY’s over the last 12 months.
| JXHGF | JXHLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FEBM | 29.52 | 0.05 | +0.19% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| BCIL | 29.67 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Bancreek International Large Cap ETF | |||
| STXT | 20.24 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| Strive Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| JHMM | 61.99 | -0.18 | -0.29% |
| JHancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| TSME | 39.71 | -0.14 | -0.35% |
| Thrivent Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | |||
JXHGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JXHGF and IDKOF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JXHGF and IDKOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JXHGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JXHGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| IDKOF - JXHGF | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MOHCY - JXHGF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NTOIF - JXHGF | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.26% | ||
| JXHLY - JXHGF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IDKOY - JXHGF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
JXHLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JXHLY and IDKOY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JXHLY and IDKOY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JXHLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JXHLY | 100% | N/A | ||
| IDKOY - JXHLY | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISRJF - JXHLY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DCCPF - JXHLY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JXHGF - JXHLY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KLYCY - JXHLY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||