Ad is loading...
K
Price
$81.05
Change
+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:26 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
UTZ
Price
$16.95
Change
+$0.04 (+0.24%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:40 PM (EDT)
97 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

K vs UTZ

Header iconK vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts K vs UTZBanner chart's image
Kellanova
Price$81.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Utz Brands
Price$16.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
K vs UTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
K vs. UTZ commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is K is a StrongBuy and UTZ is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (K: $81.02 vs. UTZ: $16.91)
Brand notoriety: K and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: K: 92% vs. UTZ: 79%
Market capitalization -- K: $19.5B vs. UTZ: $1.5B
K [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $19.5B. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

K’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • K’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

K’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • K’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, K is a better buy in the short-term than UTZ.

Price Growth

K (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

K is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.14% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
K($19.5B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.5B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than K: UTZ (81.45) vs K (25.36). K YTD gains are higher at: 48.796 vs. UTZ (5.244). K has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. UTZ (99.2M). K has more cash in the bank: 274M vs. UTZ (52M). UTZ has less debt than K: UTZ (985M) vs K (6.53B). K has higher revenues than UTZ: K (13.1B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
KUTZK / UTZ
Capitalization19.5B1.5B1,299%
EBITDA1.76B99.2M1,776%
Gain YTD48.7965.244931%
P/E Ratio25.3681.4531%
Revenue13.1B1.44B911%
Total Cash274M52M527%
Total Debt6.53B985M663%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
K vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
K
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2061
SMR RATING
1..100
3889
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4395
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

K's Valuation (31) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (93) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (61) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's SMR Rating (38) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (89) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as UTZ (53) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

K's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (95) in the null industry. This means that K’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSLS5.580.54
+10.71%
ReShape Lifesciences Inc
PHAT9.450.72
+8.25%
Phathom Pharmaceuticals
VICR54.230.36
+0.67%
Vicor Corp
REXR41.97-0.71
-1.66%
Rexford Industrial Realty
ZTEK1.13-0.05
-4.46%
Zentek Ltd

K and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, K has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if K jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To K
1D Price
Change %
K100%
+0.30%
GIS - K
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CPB - K
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
SMPL - K
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
DAR - K
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
KHC - K
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
+0.89%
FLO - UTZ
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
GIS - UTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CAG - UTZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
CPB - UTZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
K - UTZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
More