FLO
Price
$7.27
Change
-$0.14 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.57B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UTZ
Price
$7.10
Change
+$0.03 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
640.12M
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs UTZ

Header iconFLO vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs UTZBanner chart's image
FLO vs UTZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. UTZ commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and UTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FLO: $7.41 vs. UTZ: $7.07)
Brand notoriety: FLO and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 95% vs. UTZ: 69%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $1.57B vs. UTZ: $640.12M
FLO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.57B. UTZ’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $640.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $2.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than UTZ.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -4.88% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -5.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.98% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($1.57B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($640M). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than FLO: UTZ (769.00) vs FLO (21.17). FLO (-30.017) and UTZ (-31.315) have similar YTD gains . FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 359M vs. UTZ (119M). UTZ has more cash in the bank: 73.7M vs. FLO (12.1M). UTZ has less debt than FLO: UTZ (1.04B) vs FLO (2.08B). FLO has higher revenues than UTZ: FLO (5.26B) vs UTZ (1.45B).
FLOUTZFLO / UTZ
Capitalization1.57B640M245%
EBITDA359M119M302%
Gain YTD-30.017-31.31596%
P/E Ratio21.17769.003%
Revenue5.26B1.45B363%
Total Cash12.1M73.7M16%
Total Debt2.08B1.04B201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5270
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8380
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
241
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (2) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (89) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (100) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (83) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (91) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Price Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as FLO (83) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FLO (24) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMYX31.17N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit Y
LMCQX36.10N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
TRIPX30.33N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq Idx Premier
SBASX14.08N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
GSRFX12.96N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr R6

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-3.26%
MDLZ - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
GIS - FLO
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
CAG - FLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
CPB - FLO
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
TR - FLO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-2.21%
KHC - UTZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
HSY - UTZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
JBSS - UTZ
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
GIS - UTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
FLO - UTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
More