Ad is loading...
KALL vs KWEB
KALL vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts KALL vs KWEB
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
Price$20.08
Change-$0.14 (-0.69%)
Volume$713
Net Assets9.2M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$29.31
Change-$0.09 (-0.31%)
Volume$43.54K
Net Assets5.39B
KALL vs KWEB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KALL vs. KWEB commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KALL is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.39B vs. KALL (9.2M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than KALL: KWEB (0.547) vs KALL (-2.195). KALL was incepted earlier than KWEB: KALL (10 years) vs KWEB (11 years). KWEB has a higher turnover KALL (55.00) vs KALL (55.00).
| KALL | KWEB | KALL / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | -2.195 | 0.547 | -401% |
| Net Assets | 9.2M | 5.39B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 55.00 | 60.00 | 92% |
| Yield | 3.41 | 1.76 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KALL | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 16 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 16 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 79% | 29 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
KALL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALL has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALL jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALL | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| BEKE - KALL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TME - KALL | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| NIO - KALL | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| ATHM - KALL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| TCOM - KALL | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||