Advertisement
KAOCF vs KAOOY
To understand the difference between Kao Corporation (KAOCF) vs. Kao Corporation - ADR (KAOOY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KAOCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKAOOY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KAOCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KAOOY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KAOCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KAOOY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KAOCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KAOOY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
KAOCF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +6.76% price change this week, while KAOOY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
KAOOY is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+0.88% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| KAOCF | KAOOY | KAOCF / KAOOY | |
| Capitalization | 17.8B | 17.8B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 192B | 192B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 17.163 | 12.501 | 137% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.25 | 34.01 | 101% |
| Revenue | 1.55T | 1.55T | 100% |
| Total Cash | 220B | 220B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 255B | 255B | 100% |
KAOCF | KAOOY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KAOOY's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (48). This means that KAOOY’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.
KAOOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (100). This means that KAOOY’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.
KAOOY's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (77). This means that KAOOY’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.
KAOOY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (55). This means that KAOOY’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.
KAOCF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOOY (95). This means that KAOCF’s stock grew similarly to KAOOY’s over the last 12 months.
| KAOCF | KAOOY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MFM | 5.07 | 0.03 | +0.50% |
| MFS Municipal Income Trust | |||
| VIG | 209.14 | 1.04 | +0.50% |
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | |||
| DVDN | 22.51 | 0.07 | +0.31% |
| Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF | |||
| TRND | 32.47 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | |||
| NRK | 9.38 | 0.01 | +0.11% |
| Nuveen New York AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
KAOCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KAOCF and KAOOY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KAOCF and KAOOY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KAOCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAOCF | 100% | +6.76% | ||
| KAOOY - KAOCF | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
| SPB - KAOCF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
| KCDMF - KAOCF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KCDMY - KAOCF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| KSRYY - KAOCF | 5% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||
KAOOY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KAOOY has been loosely correlated with UNICY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KAOOY jumps, then UNICY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KAOOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAOOY | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| UNICY - KAOOY | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| KSRYY - KAOOY | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| SSDOY - KAOOY | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| KAOCF - KAOOY | 28% Poorly correlated | +6.76% | ||
| LRLCY - KAOOY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||