KAOCF
Price
$44.79
Change
-$0.85 (-1.86%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
17.84B
KCDMF
Price
$1.86
Change
-$0.05 (-2.62%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KAOCF vs KCDMF

Header iconKAOCF vs KCDMF Comparison
Open Charts KAOCF vs KCDMFBanner chart's image
Kao
Price$44.79
Change-$0.85 (-1.86%)
Volume$200
Capitalization17.84B
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico, S.A.B de C.V
Price$1.86
Change-$0.05 (-2.62%)
Volume$7.55K
Capitalization7.29B
KAOCF vs KCDMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KAOCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KAOCF vs. KCDMF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KAOCF is a Hold and KCDMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (KAOCF: $44.79 vs. KCDMF: $1.86)
Brand notoriety: KAOCF and KCDMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KAOCF: 96% vs. KCDMF: 245%
Market capitalization -- KAOCF: $17.84B vs. KCDMF: $7.29B
KAOCF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $17.84B. KCDMF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $7.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KAOCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKCDMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KAOCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KCDMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KCDMF is a better buy in the long-term than KAOCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KAOCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KCDMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KAOCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KCDMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KAOCF is a better buy in the short-term than KCDMF.

Price Growth

KAOCF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KCDMF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.73% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KAOCF($17.8B) has a higher market cap than KCDMF($7.29B). KAOCF has higher P/E ratio than KCDMF: KAOCF (34.25) vs KCDMF (19.96). KCDMF YTD gains are higher at: 32.857 vs. KAOCF (9.739). KAOCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 192B vs. KCDMF (13.6B). KAOCF has more cash in the bank: 220B vs. KCDMF (20.2B). KCDMF has less debt than KAOCF: KCDMF (31.7B) vs KAOCF (255B). KAOCF has higher revenues than KCDMF: KAOCF (1.55T) vs KCDMF (52.8B).
KAOCFKCDMFKAOCF / KCDMF
Capitalization17.8B7.29B244%
EBITDA192B13.6B1,412%
Gain YTD9.73932.85730%
P/E Ratio34.2519.96172%
Revenue1.55T52.8B2,939%
Total Cash220B20.2B1,089%
Total Debt255B31.7B804%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KAOCF vs KCDMF: Fundamental Ratings
KAOCF
KCDMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3084
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10085
SMR RATING
1..100
7710
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9428
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KCDMF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (46). This means that KCDMF’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (100). This means that KCDMF’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KAOCF (77). This means that KCDMF’s stock grew significantly faster than KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (55). This means that KCDMF’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KAOCF (94). This means that KCDMF’s stock grew significantly faster than KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KAOCFKCDMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KAOCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDVG42.910.10
+0.23%
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
ADME48.860.04
+0.07%
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
AGQI15.68-0.04
-0.25%
First Trust Active Gbl Qual Inc ETF
IEMG61.70-0.33
-0.53%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
JETU23.60-2.12
-8.26%
MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN

KAOCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KAOCF and KAOOY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KAOCF and KAOOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KAOCF
1D Price
Change %
KAOCF100%
N/A
KAOOY - KAOCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
SPB - KAOCF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
KCDMF - KAOCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
KCDMY - KAOCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
KSRYY - KAOCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KCDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KCDMF has been loosely correlated with KITAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KCDMF jumps, then KITAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KCDMF
1D Price
Change %
KCDMF100%
-2.62%
KITAF - KCDMF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KCDMY - KCDMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
KPTSF - KCDMF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAOCF - KCDMF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HENOY - KCDMF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More