KAOCF
Price
$46.18
Change
+$2.22 (+5.05%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
21.77B
KCDMY
Price
$9.94
Change
+$0.17 (+1.74%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.82B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KAOCF vs KCDMY

Header iconKAOCF vs KCDMY Comparison
Open Charts KAOCF vs KCDMYBanner chart's image
Kao
Price$46.18
Change+$2.22 (+5.05%)
Volume$454
Capitalization21.77B
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico, S.A.B de C.V
Price$9.94
Change+$0.17 (+1.74%)
Volume$23.45K
Capitalization5.82B
KAOCF vs KCDMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KAOCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCDMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KAOCF vs. KCDMY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KAOCF is a Hold and KCDMY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (KAOCF: $46.18 vs. KCDMY: $9.94)
Brand notoriety: KAOCF and KCDMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KAOCF: 55% vs. KCDMY: 76%
Market capitalization -- KAOCF: $21.77B vs. KCDMY: $5.82B
KAOCF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $21.77B. KCDMY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $5.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $374.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $22.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KAOCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKCDMY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KAOCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KCDMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KCDMY is a better buy in the long-term than KAOCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KAOCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KCDMY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KAOCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KCDMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KCDMY is a better buy in the short-term than KAOCF.

Price Growth

KAOCF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KCDMY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +5.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

KCDMY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.48% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KAOCF($21.8B) has a higher market cap than KCDMY($5.82B). KAOCF has higher P/E ratio than KCDMY: KAOCF (27.85) vs KCDMY (15.50). KCDMY YTD gains are higher at: 41.146 vs. KAOCF (13.145). KAOCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249B vs. KCDMY (15B). KAOCF has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. KCDMY (11B). KCDMY has less debt than KAOCF: KCDMY (22B) vs KAOCF (241B). KAOCF has higher revenues than KCDMY: KAOCF (1.65T) vs KCDMY (54.8B).
KAOCFKCDMYKAOCF / KCDMY
Capitalization21.8B5.82B374%
EBITDA249B15B1,660%
Gain YTD13.14541.14632%
P/E Ratio27.8515.50180%
Revenue1.65T54.8B3,009%
Total Cash326B11B2,964%
Total Debt241B22B1,095%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KAOCF vs KCDMY: Fundamental Ratings
KAOCF
KCDMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
10012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8629
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KCDMY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (44). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KAOCF (100). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KAOCF (100). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew significantly faster than KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOCF (60). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew similarly to KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMY's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KAOCF (86). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KAOCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KAOCFKCDMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KAOCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KCDMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIIIX529.64N/A
N/A
Vanguard Institutional Index Instl Pl
FRETX34.44N/A
N/A
Franklin Equity Income C
WFALX21.79N/A
N/A
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
NMAVX12.44N/A
N/A
Nuance Mid Cap Value Investor
RGIVX14.27N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc I

KAOCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KAOCF and KAOOY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KAOCF and KAOOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KAOCF
1D Price
Change %
KAOCF100%
N/A
KAOOY - KAOCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
SPB - KAOCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
KCDMF - KAOCF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KCDMY - KAOCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
KSRYY - KAOCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KCDMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KCDMY has been loosely correlated with KCDMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KCDMY jumps, then KCDMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KCDMY
1D Price
Change %
KCDMY100%
+1.74%
KCDMF - KCDMY
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
COTY - KCDMY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
HEGIY - KCDMY
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
IPAR - KCDMY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
NUS - KCDMY
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.59%
More