KAOOY
Price
$8.63
Change
-$0.13 (-1.48%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.25B
LRLCY
Price
$85.34
Change
-$0.74 (-0.86%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
229.24B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KAOOY vs LRLCY

Header iconKAOOY vs LRLCY Comparison
Open Charts KAOOY vs LRLCYBanner chart's image
Kao
Price$8.63
Change-$0.13 (-1.48%)
Volume$84.74K
Capitalization20.25B
L'Oreal
Price$85.34
Change-$0.74 (-0.86%)
Volume$138.13K
Capitalization229.24B
KAOOY vs LRLCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KAOOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KAOOY vs. LRLCY commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KAOOY is a Hold and LRLCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (KAOOY: $8.64 vs. LRLCY: $85.66)
Brand notoriety: KAOOY and LRLCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KAOOY: 138% vs. LRLCY: 65%
Market capitalization -- KAOOY: $20.25B vs. LRLCY: $229.24B
KAOOY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $20.25B. LRLCY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $229.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KAOOY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLRLCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KAOOY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LRLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRLCY is a better buy in the long-term than KAOOY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KAOOY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRLCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KAOOY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LRLCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KAOOY is a better buy in the short-term than LRLCY.

Price Growth

KAOOY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while LRLCY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRLCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.09% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRLCY($229B) has a higher market cap than KAOOY($20.3B). LRLCY has higher P/E ratio than KAOOY: LRLCY (31.94) vs KAOOY (26.19). LRLCY YTD gains are higher at: 23.914 vs. KAOOY (6.932). KAOOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 249B vs. LRLCY (10.7B). KAOOY has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. LRLCY (4.82B). LRLCY has less debt than KAOOY: LRLCY (8.83B) vs KAOOY (241B). KAOOY has higher revenues than LRLCY: KAOOY (1.65T) vs LRLCY (43.8B).
KAOOYLRLCYKAOOY / LRLCY
Capitalization20.3B229B9%
EBITDA249B10.7B2,327%
Gain YTD6.93223.91429%
P/E Ratio26.1931.9482%
Revenue1.65T43.8B3,765%
Total Cash326B4.82B6,761%
Total Debt241B8.83B2,730%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KAOOY vs LRLCY: Fundamental Ratings
KAOOY
LRLCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1756
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9146
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KAOOY's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (53). This means that KAOOY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KAOOY (100). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KAOOY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOOY (100). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to KAOOY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as KAOOY (61). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to KAOOY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KAOOY (91). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KAOOY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KAOOYLRLCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KAOOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CURE77.192.06
+2.74%
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
SPYU52.941.03
+1.98%
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
VOE174.502.21
+1.28%
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
SNAV34.430.22
+0.63%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
CARY20.99N/A
N/A
Angel Oak Income ETF

KAOOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KAOOY has been loosely correlated with UNICY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KAOOY jumps, then UNICY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KAOOY
1D Price
Change %
KAOOY100%
+0.12%
UNICY - KAOOY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
KSRYY - KAOOY
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.06%
SSDOY - KAOOY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
KAOCF - KAOOY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRLCY - KAOOY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More

LRLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCY has been loosely correlated with BDRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCY jumps, then BDRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCY
1D Price
Change %
LRLCY100%
+0.37%
BDRFY - LRLCY
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
LRLCF - LRLCY
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
COTY - LRLCY
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
EL - LRLCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
HENKY - LRLCY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More