Advertisement
KAYS vs SHIEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KAYS is a Hold and SHIEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KAYS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHIEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KAYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHIEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KAYS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHIEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KAYS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SHIEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
| KAYS | SHIEF | KAYS / SHIEF | |
| Capitalization | 478K | 64M | 1% |
| EBITDA | -1.68M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -58.929 | 11.594 | -508% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.30 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 14.2K | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 50.7K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 9.17M | N/A | - |
KAYS | SHIEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KAYS's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHIEF (90). This means that KAYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHIEF’s over the last 12 months.
KAYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SHIEF (100). This means that KAYS’s stock grew similarly to SHIEF’s over the last 12 months.
SHIEF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as KAYS (100). This means that SHIEF’s stock grew similarly to KAYS’s over the last 12 months.
SHIEF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KAYS (98). This means that SHIEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KAYS’s over the last 12 months.
KAYS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHIEF (93). This means that KAYS’s stock grew significantly faster than SHIEF’s over the last 12 months.
| KAYS | SHIEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 31% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 17% |
Advertisement
KAYS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KAYS and KMDA have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KAYS and KMDA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KAYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAYS | 100% | +3.60% | ||
| KMDA - KAYS | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| UPC - KAYS | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| SHIEF - KAYS | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRUFF - KAYS | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.75% | ||
| IMCC - KAYS | 3% Poorly correlated | +7.03% | ||
More | ||||
SHIEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHIEF and TLRY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHIEF and TLRY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHIEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHIEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TLRY - SHIEF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| CGC - SHIEF | 26% Poorly correlated | +19.05% | ||
| ACB - SHIEF | 25% Poorly correlated | +6.41% | ||
| IMCC - SHIEF | 25% Poorly correlated | +7.03% | ||
| CVSI - SHIEF | 20% Poorly correlated | +7.86% | ||
More | ||||