KBYPF vs LIOPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KBYPF is a Hold and LIOPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KBYPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIOPY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KBYPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LIOPY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KBYPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- KBYPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
KBYPF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LIOPY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.90%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-3.48% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| KBYPF | LIOPY | KBYPF / LIOPY | |
| Capitalization | 4.23B | 2.51B | 168% |
| EBITDA | 28B | 43.4B | 65% |
| Gain YTD | -32.296 | -15.044 | 215% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.57 | 24.17 | 118% |
| Revenue | 167B | 403B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 101B | 97.8B | 103% |
| Total Debt | 879M | 30.3B | 3% |
| KBYPF | LIOPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 4% | 2 days ago 20% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 2% | 2 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JICAX | 79.62 | -0.26 | -0.33% |
| JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders A | |||
| LEIFX | 25.33 | -0.15 | -0.59% |
| Federated Hermes Equity Income A | |||
| HDPBX | 24.31 | -0.17 | -0.69% |
| Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Retail | |||
| JMGQX | 52.04 | -0.48 | -0.91% |
| JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R4 | |||
| TWVLX | 7.79 | -0.71 | -8.35% |
| American Century Value Inv | |||
KBYPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBYPF has been loosely correlated with ETTYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBYPF jumps, then ETTYF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KBYPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBYPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ETTYF - KBYPF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LIOPY - KBYPF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GROV - KBYPF | 12% Poorly correlated | -6.08% | ||
| EWCZ - KBYPF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
| HNST - KBYPF | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.58% | ||
More | ||||
LIOPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LIOPY and KBYPF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIOPY and KBYPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIOPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIOPY | 100% | N/A | ||
| KBYPF - LIOPY | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OLVI - LIOPY | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| HNST - LIOPY | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.58% | ||
| KVUE - LIOPY | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ZOONF - LIOPY | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||