KCDMF
Price
$1.75
Change
-$0.11 (-5.91%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.29B
KPTSF
Price
$6.85
Change
+$0.06 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
64.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KCDMF vs KPTSF

Header iconKCDMF vs KPTSF Comparison
Open Charts KCDMF vs KPTSFBanner chart's image
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico, S.A.B de C.V
Price$1.75
Change-$0.11 (-5.91%)
Volume$3.89K
Capitalization7.29B
KP Tissue
Price$6.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.88%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization64.34M
KCDMF vs KPTSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KCDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KPTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KCDMF vs. KPTSF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCDMF is a StrongBuy and KPTSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (KCDMF: $1.75 vs. KPTSF: $6.85)
Brand notoriety: KCDMF and KPTSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KCDMF: 137% vs. KPTSF: 194%
Market capitalization -- KCDMF: $7.29B vs. KPTSF: $64.34M
KCDMF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $7.29B. KPTSF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $64.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KCDMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKPTSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KCDMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KPTSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KCDMF is a better buy in the long-term than KPTSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KCDMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KPTSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KCDMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KPTSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KCDMF is a better buy in the short-term than KPTSF.

Price Growth

KCDMF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KPTSF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.91% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KCDMF($7.29B) has a higher market cap than KPTSF($64.3M). KPTSF has higher P/E ratio than KCDMF: KPTSF (97.09) vs KCDMF (19.96). KCDMF YTD gains are higher at: 25.357 vs. KPTSF (20.556). KCDMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. KPTSF (0). KCDMF has higher revenues than KPTSF: KCDMF (52.8B) vs KPTSF (0).
KCDMFKPTSFKCDMF / KPTSF
Capitalization7.29B64.3M11,334%
EBITDA13.6B0-
Gain YTD25.35720.556123%
P/E Ratio19.9697.0921%
Revenue52.8B0-
Total Cash20.2BN/A-
Total Debt31.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KCDMF vs KPTSF: Fundamental Ratings
KCDMF
KPTSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9393
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
10100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
487
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KPTSF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as KCDMF (37). This means that KPTSF’s stock grew similarly to KCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as KPTSF (100). This means that KCDMF’s stock grew similarly to KPTSF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KPTSF (100). This means that KCDMF’s stock grew significantly faster than KPTSF’s over the last 12 months.

KPTSF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as KCDMF (53). This means that KPTSF’s stock grew similarly to KCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

KPTSF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KCDMF (48). This means that KPTSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KCDMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KCDMFKPTSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KCDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KPTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSMD31.630.31
+0.99%
Congress SMid Growth ETF
EUSA100.840.56
+0.56%
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
ARB28.610.16
+0.56%
AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF
LYLD26.660.04
+0.16%
Cambria LargeCap Shareholder Yield ETF
TOKE4.58-0.02
-0.47%
Cambria Cannabis ETF

KCDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KCDMF has been loosely correlated with KITAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KCDMF jumps, then KITAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KCDMF
1D Price
Change %
KCDMF100%
N/A
KITAF - KCDMF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KCDMY - KCDMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
KPTSF - KCDMF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
KAOCF - KCDMF
15%
Poorly correlated
-7.39%
HENOY - KCDMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
More

KPTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KPTSF has been loosely correlated with KITAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KPTSF jumps, then KITAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPTSF
1D Price
Change %
KPTSF100%
+0.83%
KITAF - KPTSF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KCDMF - KPTSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KCDMY - KPTSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
HENOF - KPTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSRYY - KPTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
More