KCDMY
Price
$9.78
Change
-$0.27 (-2.69%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.04B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
KPTSF
Price
$6.60
Change
-$0.17 (-2.51%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
66.07M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KCDMY vs KPTSF

Header iconKCDMY vs KPTSF Comparison
Open Charts KCDMY vs KPTSFBanner chart's image
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico, S.A.B de C.V
Price$9.78
Change-$0.27 (-2.69%)
Volume$30.39K
Capitalization6.04B
KP Tissue
Price$6.60
Change-$0.17 (-2.51%)
Volume$496
Capitalization66.07M
KCDMY vs KPTSF Comparison Chart in %
KCDMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KPTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KCDMY vs. KPTSF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCDMY is a Hold and KPTSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (KCDMY: $9.78 vs. KPTSF: $6.60)
Brand notoriety: KCDMY and KPTSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KCDMY: 74% vs. KPTSF: 85%
Market capitalization -- KCDMY: $6.04B vs. KPTSF: $66.07M
KCDMY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $6.04B. KPTSF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $66.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $354.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KCDMY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKPTSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KCDMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KPTSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KCDMY is a better buy in the long-term than KPTSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KCDMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KPTSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KCDMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KPTSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KPTSF is a better buy in the short-term than KCDMY.

Price Growth

KCDMY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while KPTSF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

KCDMY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KCDMY($6.04B) has a higher market cap than KPTSF($66.1M). KPTSF has higher P/E ratio than KCDMY: KPTSF (21.08) vs KCDMY (15.07). KCDMY YTD gains are higher at: 42.408 vs. KPTSF (16.191). KCDMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. KPTSF (0). KCDMY has higher revenues than KPTSF: KCDMY (54.8B) vs KPTSF (0).
KCDMYKPTSFKCDMY / KPTSF
Capitalization6.04B66.1M9,133%
EBITDA15B0-
Gain YTD42.40816.191262%
P/E Ratio15.0721.0871%
Revenue54.8B0-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KCDMY vs KPTSF: Fundamental Ratings
KCDMY
KPTSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
12100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KPTSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as KCDMY (15). This means that KPTSF’s stock grew similarly to KCDMY’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KPTSF (100). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KPTSF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KPTSF (100). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew significantly faster than KPTSF’s over the last 12 months.

KCDMY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as KPTSF (51). This means that KCDMY’s stock grew similarly to KPTSF’s over the last 12 months.

KPTSF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as KCDMY (23). This means that KPTSF’s stock grew similarly to KCDMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KCDMYKPTSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
17%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KCDMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KPTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MECVX16.380.06
+0.37%
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Investor Class
VTSAX158.59N/A
N/A
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
OFALX18.54N/A
N/A
Olstein All Cap Value C
PESPX29.33N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon MidCap Index Inv
AZNAX11.57N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth A

KCDMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KCDMY has been loosely correlated with KCDMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KCDMY jumps, then KCDMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KCDMY
1D Price
Change %
KCDMY100%
-2.69%
KCDMF - KCDMY
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
COTY - KCDMY
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.58%
HEGIY - KCDMY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
IPAR - KCDMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
NUS - KCDMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

KPTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KPTSF has been loosely correlated with KITAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KPTSF jumps, then KITAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPTSF
1D Price
Change %
KPTSF100%
-2.48%
KITAF - KPTSF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KCDMF - KPTSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KCDMY - KPTSF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
HENOF - KPTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSRYY - KPTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
More