Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCEIX vs NLSAX
KCEIX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts KCEIX vs NLSAX
Knights of Columbus Long/Short Eq I
Price$12.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.99M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
KCEIX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCEIX vs. NLSAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCEIX is a StrongBuy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. KCEIX (170M). KCEIX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: KCEIX (1.98) vs NLSAX (0.00). KCEIX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: KCEIX (6 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). KCEIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). KCEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCEIX: NLSAX (1000) vs KCEIX (25000). KCEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. NLSAX (9.59). KCEIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.67 vs. NLSAX (23.68).
| KCEIX | NLSAX | KCEIX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.68 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.68 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.445 | 6.501 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 7.54B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 9.59 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.70 | 19.36 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.67 | 23.68 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement