Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCEIX vs NLSCX
KCEIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts KCEIX vs NLSCX
Knights of Columbus Long/Short Eq I
Price$12.34
Change+$0.05 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.65M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.78
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.81B
KCEIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCEIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCEIX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.81B vs. KCEIX (173M). KCEIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: KCEIX (1.98) vs NLSCX (0.00). KCEIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: KCEIX (6 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than KCEIX (1.89). KCEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCEIX: NLSCX (1000) vs KCEIX (25000). NLSCX (7.58) and KCEIX (7.47) have marching annual gain over last year. KCEIX return over 5 years is better than : 53.30 vs. NLSCX (19.59).
| KCEIX | NLSCX | KCEIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 2.43 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.942 | 5.936 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000 | 2,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 7.81B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.47 | 7.58 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.88 | 20.67 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.30 | 19.59 | 272% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers