Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCEIX vs NLSIX
KCEIX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts KCEIX vs NLSIX
Knights of Columbus Long/Short Eq I
Price$12.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.73M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
KCEIX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCEIX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCEIX is a StrongBuy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. KCEIX (170M). KCEIX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: KCEIX (1.98) vs NLSIX (0.02). KCEIX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: KCEIX (6 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). KCEIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). KCEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). KCEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: KCEIX (25000) vs NLSIX (1000000). KCEIX (10.36) and NLSIX (10.03) have marching annual gain over last year. KCEIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.67 vs. NLSIX (26.04).
| KCEIX | NLSIX | KCEIX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.32 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.32 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.445 | 6.720 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 1000000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 7.54B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 0.02 | 9,616% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 10.03 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.70 | 20.80 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.67 | 26.04 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers