Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGACX
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGACX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$24.75
Change+$0.53 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.51M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.77
Change+$1.67 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. KCGIX (266M). RGACX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs KCGIX (0.03). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KCGIX (11 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.76). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGACX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. RGACX (6.21). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.43 vs. RGACX (29.81).
| KCGIX | RGACX | KCGIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.960 | 16.363 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.72 | 6.21 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.59 | 60.61 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.43 | 29.81 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.76 | 86.59 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement