Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGACX
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGACX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$23.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.77M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
KCGIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. KCGIX (261M). RGACX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs KCGIX (0.06). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KCGIX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.76). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGACX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.28 vs. RGACX (21.05). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 50.03 vs. RGACX (40.21).
| KCGIX | RGACX | KCGIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.94 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.220 | 12.238 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.07 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.28 | 21.05 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.70 | 43.84 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.03 | 40.21 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.50 | 80.13 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement