Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGAHX
KCGIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGAHX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$24.90
Change+$0.20 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.58M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.17
Change+$0.65 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
KCGIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KCGIX (279M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KCGIX: RGAHX (0.45) vs KCGIX (0.03). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KCGIX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KCGIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGAHX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.90 vs. RGAHX (14.91). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.81 vs. RGAHX (42.99).
| KCGIX | RGAHX | KCGIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.44 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.258 | 20.057 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.45 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.90 | 14.91 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.05 | 76.57 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.81 | 42.99 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement