Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCIIX vs VFWPX
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts KCIIX vs VFWPX
Knights of Columbus International Eq I
Price$14.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.4M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.92
Change-$1.47 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
KCIIX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCIIX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCIIX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. KCIIX (246M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than KCIIX: VFWPX (2.70) vs KCIIX (2.21). KCIIX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: KCIIX (11 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). KCIIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). KCIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). KCIIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: KCIIX (25000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.86 vs. KCIIX (20.59). KCIIX (35.71) and VFWPX (34.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| KCIIX | VFWPX | KCIIX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.03 | 3,667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.03 | 3,733% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.625 | 26.112 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 2.70 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.59 | 22.86 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.52 | 47.03 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.71 | 34.76 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.57 | 70.71 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers