Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWEBX
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWEBX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$20.10
Change+$0.20 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets273.75M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.71
Change+$0.63 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.17B
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. KCXIX (274M). KCXIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: KCXIX (0.93) vs RWEBX (0.76). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than KCXIX (0.43). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (3.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWEBX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. RWEBX (2.72). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 88.44 vs. RWEBX (40.69).
| KCXIX | RWEBX | KCXIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.06 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.06 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.688 | 8.076 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 202B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.76 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 2.72 | 293% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.43 | 25.48 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.44 | 40.69 | 217% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers