Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWEBX
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWEBX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$20.11
Change-$0.57 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.4M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.30
Change-$1.43 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.61B
KCXIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. KCXIX (275M). KCXIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: KCXIX (0.95) vs RWEBX (0.76). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than KCXIX (0.43). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (3.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWEBX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.82 vs. RWEBX (2.55). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 102.71 vs. RWEBX (44.00).
| KCXIX | RWEBX | KCXIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.06 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.06 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.066 | 7.402 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.76 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.82 | 2.55 | 698% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.17 | 41.22 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.71 | 44.00 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers