Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs VITSX
KCXIX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs VITSX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$18.39
Change+$0.18 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.65M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$143.69
Change+$1.51 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
KCXIX vs VITSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. VITSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. KCXIX (226M). VITSX pays higher dividends than KCXIX: VITSX (1.29) vs KCXIX (1.07). KCXIX was incepted earlier than VITSX: KCXIX (5 years) vs VITSX (28 years). KCXIX (0.43) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). KCXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). KCXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: KCXIX (25000) vs VITSX (5000000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.36 vs. VITSX (10.97). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 95.96 vs. VITSX (80.96).
| KCXIX | VITSX | KCXIX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.03 | 833% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.03 | 1,433% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.726 | 0.833 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 5000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 226M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.29 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.36 | 10.97 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.25 | 40.35 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.96 | 80.96 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 180.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement