Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs VITSX
KCXIX vs VITSX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs VITSX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$19.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.4M
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
Price$148.76
Change-$0.06 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
KCXIX vs VITSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. VITSX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Buy and VITSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VITSX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. KCXIX (239M). VITSX pays higher dividends than KCXIX: VITSX (1.22) vs KCXIX (1.03). KCXIX was incepted earlier than VITSX: KCXIX (6 years) vs VITSX (28 years). KCXIX (0.43) is less costly to investors than VITSX (0.03). KCXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. VITSX (2.00). KCXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VITSX: KCXIX (25000) vs VITSX (5000000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. VITSX (12.31). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 109.92 vs. VITSX (92.74).
| KCXIX | VITSX | KCXIX / VITSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.03 | 833% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.03 | 1,433% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.944 | 5.558 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 5000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.22 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.53 | 12.31 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.70 | 57.51 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.92 | 92.74 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 195.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement