KDDIF
Price
$15.70
Change
+$0.46 (+3.02%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
59.61B
LICT
Price
$11000.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
173.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KDDIF vs LICT

Header iconKDDIF vs LICT Comparison
Open Charts KDDIF vs LICTBanner chart's image
KDDI
Price$15.70
Change+$0.46 (+3.02%)
Volume$37
Capitalization59.61B
LICT
Price$11000.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25
Capitalization173.05M
KDDIF vs LICT Comparison Chart in %
KDDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KDDIF vs. LICT commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KDDIF is a Hold and LICT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (KDDIF: $15.70 vs. LICT: $11000.00)
Brand notoriety: KDDIF and LICT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KDDIF: 0% vs. LICT: 274%
Market capitalization -- KDDIF: $59.61B vs. LICT: $173.05M
KDDIF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $59.61B. LICT’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $173.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $259B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KDDIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLICT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KDDIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LICT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LICT is a better buy in the long-term than KDDIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KDDIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LICT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KDDIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LICT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LICT is a better buy in the short-term than KDDIF.

Price Growth

KDDIF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while LICT (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.56% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KDDIF($59.6B) has a higher market cap than LICT($173M). LICT has higher P/E ratio than KDDIF: LICT (19.26) vs KDDIF (13.73). KDDIF YTD gains are higher at: -8.721 vs. LICT (-22.807).
KDDIFLICTKDDIF / LICT
Capitalization59.6B173M34,451%
EBITDA1.82TN/A-
Gain YTD-8.721-22.80738%
P/E Ratio13.7319.2671%
Revenue5.92TN/A-
Total Cash1.36TN/A-
Total Debt4.44TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KDDIF vs LICT: Fundamental Ratings
KDDIF
LICT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
857
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
1004
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6179
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KDDIF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LICT (79). This means that KDDIF’s stock grew similarly to LICT’s over the last 12 months.

KDDIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LICT (100). This means that KDDIF’s stock grew similarly to LICT’s over the last 12 months.

LICT's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KDDIF (100). This means that LICT’s stock grew significantly faster than KDDIF’s over the last 12 months.

KDDIF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as LICT (79). This means that KDDIF’s stock grew similarly to LICT’s over the last 12 months.

LICT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KDDIF (72). This means that LICT’s stock grew somewhat faster than KDDIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KDDIFLICT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KDDIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LICT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSHLX59.87N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth L
GGHPX8.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem P
VVSCX12.78N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Small Cap Value
SUIAX63.06N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI International A
ACVDX11.04N/A
N/A
American Century International Val R6

KDDIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KDDIF and LMGHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KDDIF and LMGHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KDDIF
1D Price
Change %
KDDIF100%
N/A
LMGHF - KDDIF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KDDIY - KDDIF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
LBRDB - KDDIF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KKPNF - KDDIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
LICT - KDDIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LICT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LICT and CTOWY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LICT and CTOWY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LICT
1D Price
Change %
LICT100%
N/A
CTOWY - LICT
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTTWF - LICT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNIT - LICT
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTNOF - LICT
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LILAB - LICT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More