KGAUF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.04 (-26.67%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
VTSCY
Price
$10.00
Change
-$0.50 (-4.76%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

KGAUF vs VTSCY

Header iconKGAUF vs VTSCY Comparison
Open Charts KGAUF vs VTSCYBanner chart's image
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
Price$0.11
Change-$0.04 (-26.67%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Vitesco Technologies Group AG
Price$10.00
Change-$0.50 (-4.76%)
Volume$3.27K
CapitalizationN/A
KGAUF vs VTSCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTSCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGAUF vs. VTSCY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGAUF is a Hold and VTSCY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (KGAUF: $0.11 vs. VTSCY: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: KGAUF and VTSCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGAUF: 66% vs. VTSCY: 165%
Market capitalization -- KGAUF: $238.15M vs. VTSCY: $3.43B
KGAUF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $238.15M. VTSCY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVTSCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VTSCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KGAUF and VTSCY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGAUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTSCY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGAUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • VTSCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGAUF is a better buy in the short-term than VTSCY.

Price Growth

KGAUF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VTSCY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-2.82% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSCY($3.43B) has a higher market cap than KGAUF($238M). VTSCY has higher P/E ratio than KGAUF: VTSCY (104.17) vs KGAUF (10.00). VTSCY YTD gains are higher at: -40.320 vs. KGAUF (-43.272). VTSCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 658M vs. KGAUF (81.9M). VTSCY has more cash in the bank: 823M vs. KGAUF (179M). KGAUF has less debt than VTSCY: KGAUF (264M) vs VTSCY (451M). VTSCY has higher revenues than KGAUF: VTSCY (9.13B) vs KGAUF (916M).
KGAUFVTSCYKGAUF / VTSCY
Capitalization238M3.43B7%
EBITDA81.9M658M12%
Gain YTD-43.272-40.320107%
P/E Ratio10.00104.1710%
Revenue916M9.13B10%
Total Cash179M823M22%
Total Debt264M451M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGAUF: Fundamental Ratings
KGAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
36
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGAUFVTSCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTSCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

KGAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGAUF has been loosely correlated with NTXVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGAUF jumps, then NTXVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGAUF
1D Price
Change %
KGAUF100%
N/A
NTXVF - KGAUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPS - KGAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.04%
NHKGF - KGAUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLRY - KGAUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTSCY - KGAUF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VTSCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VTSCY and WLMTF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VTSCY and WLMTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VTSCY
1D Price
Change %
VTSCY100%
N/A
WLMTF - VTSCY
9%
Poorly correlated
-9.86%
NKRKF - VTSCY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNTHY - VTSCY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
PHIN - VTSCY
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.36%
CREV - VTSCY
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.71%
More