KGAUF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
161.61M
WLMTF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
300.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGAUF vs WLMTF

Header iconKGAUF vs WLMTF Comparison
Open Charts KGAUF vs WLMTFBanner chart's image
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
Price$0.13
Change-$0.03 (-18.75%)
Volume$21.5K
Capitalization161.61M
Wuling Motors Holdings
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization300.45M
KGAUF vs WLMTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGAUF vs. WLMTF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGAUF is a Hold and WLMTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KGAUF: $0.13 vs. WLMTF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: KGAUF and WLMTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGAUF: 145% vs. WLMTF: 19%
Market capitalization -- KGAUF: $161.61M vs. WLMTF: $300.45M
KGAUF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $161.61M. WLMTF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $300.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLMTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLMTF is a better buy in the long-term than KGAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGAUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WLMTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMTF is a better buy in the short-term than KGAUF.

Price Growth

KGAUF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMTF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +8.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.96% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMTF($300M) has a higher market cap than KGAUF($162M). WLMTF YTD gains are higher at: 111.712 vs. KGAUF (15.344). WLMTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199M vs. KGAUF (20.1M). WLMTF has more cash in the bank: 2.95B vs. KGAUF (80.3M). KGAUF has less debt than WLMTF: KGAUF (199M) vs WLMTF (2.99B). WLMTF has higher revenues than KGAUF: WLMTF (9.34B) vs KGAUF (814M).
KGAUFWLMTFKGAUF / WLMTF
Capitalization162M300M54%
EBITDA20.1M199M10%
Gain YTD15.344111.71214%
P/E RatioN/A25.09-
Revenue814M9.34B9%
Total Cash80.3M2.95B3%
Total Debt199M2.99B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGAUF: Fundamental Ratings
KGAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGAUFWLMTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYMIX31.39N/A
N/A
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth I
VSMVX396.65N/A
N/A
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Val Idx Instl
MIQPX11.90N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq R6
QDVSX19.28N/A
N/A
FI Instl ESG Stck Fd for Ret Plns
MIIOX30.64N/A
N/A
Marsico International Opportunities Inst

KGAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGAUF has been loosely correlated with NTXVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGAUF jumps, then NTXVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGAUF
1D Price
Change %
KGAUF100%
N/A
NTXVF - KGAUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPS - KGAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
NHKGF - KGAUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLRY - KGAUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMTF - KGAUF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+5.98%
More

WLMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMTF and BRDCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMTF and BRDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMTF
1D Price
Change %
WLMTF100%
+5.98%
BRDCF - WLMTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNTHY - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NKRKF - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHKGF - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGAUF - WLMTF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More