KGAUF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.05 (+45.45%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
238.15M
WLMTF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
317.24M
Ad is loading...

KGAUF vs WLMTF

Header iconKGAUF vs WLMTF Comparison
Open Charts KGAUF vs WLMTFBanner chart's image
Kongsberg Automotive ASA
Price$0.16
Change+$0.05 (+45.45%)
Volume$500
Capitalization238.15M
Wuling Motors Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization317.24M
KGAUF vs WLMTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGAUF vs. WLMTF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGAUF is a Hold and WLMTF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (KGAUF: $0.16 vs. WLMTF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: KGAUF and WLMTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGAUF: 38% vs. WLMTF: 283%
Market capitalization -- KGAUF: $238.15M vs. WLMTF: $317.24M
KGAUF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $238.15M. WLMTF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $317.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KGAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLMTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WLMTF is a better buy in the long-term than KGAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGAUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMTF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WLMTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGAUF is a better buy in the short-term than WLMTF.

Price Growth

KGAUF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMTF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -17.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.51% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMTF($317M) has a higher market cap than KGAUF($238M). WLMTF has higher P/E ratio than KGAUF: WLMTF (92.59) vs KGAUF (10.00). KGAUF YTD gains are higher at: 40.212 vs. WLMTF (2.477). KGAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 81.9M vs. WLMTF (-26.91M). WLMTF has more cash in the bank: 3.4B vs. KGAUF (179M). KGAUF has less debt than WLMTF: KGAUF (264M) vs WLMTF (2.79B). WLMTF has higher revenues than KGAUF: WLMTF (13.5B) vs KGAUF (916M).
KGAUFWLMTFKGAUF / WLMTF
Capitalization238M317M75%
EBITDA81.9M-26.91M-304%
Gain YTD40.2122.4771,623%
P/E Ratio10.0092.5911%
Revenue916M13.5B7%
Total Cash179M3.4B5%
Total Debt264M2.79B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGAUF: Fundamental Ratings
KGAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGAUFWLMTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KGAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRI205.832.60
+1.28%
Herc Holdings
KDP31.620.34
+1.09%
Keurig Dr Pepper
CGAU5.82-0.02
-0.34%
Centerra Gold
IMMP1.93-0.01
-0.52%
Immutep Limited
JRSH3.45-0.05
-1.43%
Jerash Holdings (US)

WLMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMTF and BRDCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMTF and BRDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMTF
1D Price
Change %
WLMTF100%
N/A
BRDCF - WLMTF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.98%
MNTHY - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.36%
NKRKF - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHKGF - WLMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYZN - WLMTF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More