KGBLY
Price
$40.10
Change
+$24.79 (+161.92%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.62B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KULR
Price
$2.48
Change
-$0.23 (-8.52%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
114.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGBLY vs KULR

Header iconKGBLY vs KULR Comparison
Open Charts KGBLY vs KULRBanner chart's image
Kingboard Laminates Holdings
Price$40.10
Change+$24.79 (+161.92%)
Volume$551
Capitalization4.62B
KULR Technology Group
Price$2.48
Change-$0.23 (-8.52%)
Volume$7.37K
Capitalization114.92M
KGBLY vs KULR Comparison Chart in %
KGBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KULR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGBLY vs. KULR commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGBLY is a Hold and KULR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (KGBLY: $40.10 vs. KULR: $2.70)
Brand notoriety: KGBLY and KULR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGBLY: 29% vs. KULR: 118%
Market capitalization -- KGBLY: $4.66B vs. KULR: $113.27M
KGBLY [@Electronic Components] is valued at $4.66B. KULR’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $113.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $167.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGBLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKULR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGBLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KULR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGBLY is a better buy in the long-term than KULR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGBLY’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KULR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGBLY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KULR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGBLY is a better buy in the short-term than KULR.

Price Growth

KGBLY (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KULR (@Electronic Components) price change was -9.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-6.26% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGBLY($4.62B) has a higher market cap than KULR($115M). KGBLY YTD gains are higher at: 189.493 vs. KULR (-90.493). KGBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.94B vs. KULR (-15.53M). KGBLY has higher revenues than KULR: KGBLY (18.5B) vs KULR (13M).
KGBLYKULRKGBLY / KULR
Capitalization4.62B115M4,016%
EBITDA2.94B-15.53M-18,933%
Gain YTD189.493-90.493-209%
P/E Ratio25.39N/A-
Revenue18.5B13M142,308%
Total CashN/A20.6M-
Total DebtN/A1.76M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGBLY vs KULR: Fundamental Ratings
KGBLY
KULR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4962
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48100
SMR RATING
1..100
9394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3495
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGBLY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (35). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KULR (100). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (94). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KULR (95). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

KGBLY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KULR (100). This means that KGBLY’s stock grew significantly faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGBLYKULR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KULR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGXXF17.190.25
+1.46%
NGEx Minerals Ltd.
AGMJF13.03N/A
N/A
Algoma Central Corp.
ALTX0.25N/A
N/A
Altex Industries, Inc.
NNGRY34.85-0.51
-1.44%
NN Group NV
DIIBF1.18-0.09
-6.72%
Dorel Industries, Inc.

KGBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGBLY and IEHC have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGBLY and IEHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGBLY
1D Price
Change %
KGBLY100%
N/A
IEHC - KGBLY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KULR - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.30%
IBIDF - KGBLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNPKF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - KGBLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KULR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KULR has been loosely correlated with OUST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KULR jumps, then OUST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KULR
1D Price
Change %
KULR100%
+6.30%
OUST - KULR
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
JBL - KULR
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
FLEX - KULR
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
MTEK - KULR
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
KOPN - KULR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
More