KGC
Price
$10.97
Change
-$0.57 (-4.94%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.52B
72 days until earnings call
LOMLF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
129.14M
Ad is loading...

KGC vs LOMLF

Header iconKGC vs LOMLF Comparison
Open Charts KGC vs LOMLFBanner chart's image
Kinross Gold
Price$10.97
Change-$0.57 (-4.94%)
Volume$25.15M
Capitalization7.52B
Lion One Metals
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$687.27K
Capitalization129.14M
KGC vs LOMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGC vs. LOMLF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGC is a Hold and LOMLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (KGC: $10.97 vs. LOMLF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: KGC: Notable vs. LOMLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGC: 120% vs. LOMLF: 188%
Market capitalization -- KGC: $7.52B vs. LOMLF: $129.14M
KGC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.52B. LOMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $129.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than LOMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LOMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KGC and LOMLF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KGC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while LOMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($7.52B) has a higher market cap than LOMLF($129M). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 18.339 vs. LOMLF (10.138). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. LOMLF (-3.37M). KGC has more cash in the bank: 352M vs. LOMLF (36.9M). LOMLF has less debt than KGC: LOMLF (25.9M) vs KGC (2.26B). KGC has higher revenues than LOMLF: KGC (4.24B) vs LOMLF (0).
KGCLOMLFKGC / LOMLF
Capitalization7.52B129M5,827%
EBITDA1.76B-3.37M-52,291%
Gain YTD18.33910.138181%
P/E Ratio18.12N/A-
Revenue4.24B0-
Total Cash352M36.9M954%
Total Debt2.26B25.9M8,726%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGC vs LOMLF: Fundamental Ratings
KGC
LOMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
6293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3979
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LOMLF (29) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOMLF (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LOMLF (93) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMLF (79) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMLF (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGCLOMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBLD69.61N/A
N/A
First Trust Alerian US NextGen InfrasETF
BSMR23.74-0.01
-0.04%
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Muncpl Bd ETF
IQDG37.29-0.30
-0.80%
WisdomTree International Qual Div Gr ETF
PGRO38.92-0.92
-2.31%
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
VCR365.93-10.36
-2.75%
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF

LOMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMLF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMLF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMLF
1D Price
Change %
LOMLF100%
+3.14%
HMY - LOMLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-7.68%
HL - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-7.28%
KGC - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.94%
GOLD - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
EGO - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-8.59%
More