KGC
Price
$15.31
Change
-$0.39 (-2.48%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.52B
35 days until earnings call
PROBF
Price
$1.72
Change
+$0.02 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
204.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGC vs PROBF

Header iconKGC vs PROBF Comparison
Open Charts KGC vs PROBFBanner chart's image
Kinross Gold
Price$15.31
Change-$0.39 (-2.48%)
Volume$21.31M
Capitalization7.52B
PROBE GOLD
Price$1.72
Change+$0.02 (+1.18%)
Volume$8.53K
Capitalization204.84M
KGC vs PROBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGC vs. PROBF commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGC is a Hold and PROBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (KGC: $15.70 vs. PROBF: $1.72)
Brand notoriety: KGC: Notable vs. PROBF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGC: 69% vs. PROBF: 17%
Market capitalization -- KGC: $7.52B vs. PROBF: $204.84M
KGC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.52B. PROBF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $204.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePROBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PROBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than PROBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PROBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PROBF is a better buy in the short-term than KGC.

Price Growth

KGC (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.77% price change this week, while PROBF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

PROBF is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($7.52B) has a higher market cap than PROBF($205M). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 70.166 vs. PROBF (42.917). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. PROBF (-26.72M). KGC has more cash in the bank: 352M vs. PROBF (34.5M). PROBF has less debt than KGC: PROBF (564K) vs KGC (2.26B). KGC has higher revenues than PROBF: KGC (4.24B) vs PROBF (0).
KGCPROBFKGC / PROBF
Capitalization7.52B205M3,667%
EBITDA1.76B-26.72M-6,601%
Gain YTD70.16642.917163%
P/E Ratio18.12N/A-
Revenue4.24B0-
Total Cash352M34.5M1,020%
Total Debt2.26B564K400,709%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGC vs PROBF: Fundamental Ratings
KGC
PROBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6884
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2650
SMR RATING
1..100
4999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PROBF (83) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PROBF (50) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PROBF (99) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PROBF (38) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PROBF (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to PROBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGCPROBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PROBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVMC59.630.61
+1.03%
Calvert US Mid-Cp Cor Rspnb ETF
QQQ531.655.41
+1.03%
Invesco QQQ Trust
ETV13.510.11
+0.82%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
RCS6.850.03
+0.44%
PIMCO STRATEGIC Income FUND
NXJ11.25N/A
N/A
Nuveen New Jersey Quality Municipal Income Fund

PROBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PROBF and THM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROBF and THM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PROBF
1D Price
Change %
PROBF100%
+0.88%
THM - PROBF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
NFGC - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
TORXF - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
BTG - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
KGC - PROBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More