Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KGDZX vs SFCWX
KGDZX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts KGDZX vs SFCWX
KGDZX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KGDZX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGDZX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. KGDZX (208M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than KGDZX: SFCWX (0.92) vs KGDZX (0.84). KGDZX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: KGDZX (12 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). KGDZX (1.09) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). KGDZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). KGDZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: KGDZX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). KGDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.14 vs. SFCWX (20.13). KGDZX return over 5 years is better than : 1.59 vs. SFCWX (0.95).
| KGDZX | SFCWX | KGDZX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.65 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.65 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.259 | 17.576 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.92 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.14 | 20.13 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.69 | 41.47 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.59 | 0.95 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement