Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KGLAX vs RLBCX
KGLAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts KGLAX vs RLBCX
Kinetics Global Adv A
Price$16.31
Change-$0.09 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.54M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.43
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
KGLAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KGLAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGLAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. KGLAX (57.5M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than KGLAX: RLBCX (1.46) vs KGLAX (0.69). KGLAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: KGLAX (18 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). KGLAX (2.29) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. KGLAX (34.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than KGLAX: RLBCX (250) vs KGLAX (2500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. KGLAX (-1.77). KGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 141.75 vs. RLBCX (36.24).
| KGLAX | RLBCX | KGLAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.89 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.89 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.145 | 13.420 | 23% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.5M | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.77 | 8.46 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.69 | 39.37 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 141.75 | 36.24 | 391% |
| Returns for 10 years | 266.92 | 67.41 | 396% |